Sunita Sharma
I am pleased to introduce International Journal of Nephrology & Therapeutics (JNT) which is an open access electronic journal aiming to provide an online compendium for functioning of kidney & preventive and therapeutic measures in overcoming them. Journal of Nephrology & Therapeutics peer reviewed medical journal that fields related to Kidney diseases and hypertension. The editorial office peer reviews the submitted manuscripts to ensure quality. We have been started in year 2008 International Journal of Nephrology & Therapeutics (ISSN: 2161-0959) is growing continuously. It is our pleasure to announce that during year 2020, all issues of volume 4 were published online on time and the print issues were also brought out and dispatched within 30 days of publishing the issue online.
All published articles of this journal are included in the indexing and abstracting coverage of CAS Source Index (CASSI), Index Copernicus, Google Scholar,Sherpa Romeo, AcademicJournals Database, GenamicsJournalSeek, JournalTOCs, CiteFactor, Electronic Journals Library, RefSeek, Hamdard University, EBSCO A-Z, Directory of Abstract Indexing for Journals, World Catalogue of Scientific Journals, OCLC- WorldCat, Scholarsteer, SWB online catalog, Publons, Dtufindit, Geneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research.
During the calendar year 2020, International Journal of Nephrology & Therapeutics received a total of 30 papers, out of which 6 articles were rejected in the preliminary screening due to plagiarism or being out
Of the format and peer review process. During 2020 around 16 articles were subjected for publication after they are accepted in the peer review process. In the 5 issues of Volume 10 published during the year 2020, a total of 16 articles were published (at an average of 3 articles per issue of which, articles were published from authors all around the world. A total of 30 research scientists from all over the world reviewed the 16 articles published in volume 10. Average publication period of an article was further reduced to 14-21 days.
During the calendar year 2020, a total of three Editors, ten Reviewers joined the board of JNT and contributed their valuable services towards contribution as well as publication of articles, and their valuable reviewer comments will beneficial to publish quality of article in the Journal.
I take this opportunity to acknowledge the contribution of Editor-in-chief and Associate Editor during the final editing of articles published and bringing out issues of JNT in time. I would also like to express my gratitude to all the authors, reviewers, the publisher, language editor, honorary editors, the scientific advisory and the editorial board of JNT, the office bearers for their support in bringing out the new volume (Volume 5) of JNT for the calendar year 2020 and look forward to their unrelenting support further to release more issues for International Journal of Nephrology & Therapeutics JNT in scheduled time.
Zhen Su
There were not many related examinations meaning to serious IgA nephropathy (IgAN) which could advance quickly to end stage renal sickness (ESRD) inside ten years. To discover important clinical or neurotic factors and promising safeguards is basic. Strategy: A solitary place case-control study was performed. 50 ESRD patients with the essential driver of IgAN and a short renal endurance season of under ten years after analyze were taken on the case gathering. 100 IgAN patients with a renal endurance season of over ten years were tried out the benchmark group. IgA Oxford arrangement scores, clinical information at pattern and during the development were gathered. Multivariate strategic relapse was utilized to research factors related with the improvement of ESRD.
There were huge contrasts in standard clinical information between these two gatherings, just as the constituent proportion of Oxford MEST-score. Particular contrasts were seen in time-normal uric corrosive (TA-UA), time-normal hemoglobin (TA-Hb), time-normal egg whites (TA-Alb), time-normal absolute cholesterol (TA-TC) and time-normal urinary protein (TA-P) during the development. In multivariate strategic models, IgA oxford score M1 (OR=5.10, P=0.018) and eGFR (OR=0.97, P=0.039) at biopsy, TAUA (OR=2.06, P=0.026) and TA-Hb (OR=0.53, P=0.022) during the development were distinguished autonomous components for creating ESRD. End: IgAN patients with neurotic appraisal of M1, low gauge eGFR, TA-Hb and high TA-UA were bound to advance to ESRD, and should be given more consideration. Proper guidelines of UA, Hb and pee protein after analyze might be a promising treatment.
There were not many related examinations planning to serious IgA nephropathy (IgAN) which could advance quickly to end stage renal illness (ESRD) inside ten years. To discover important clinical or neurotic factors and promising safeguards is fundamental.
A solitary community case–control study was performed. Fifty ESRD patients with the essential driver of IgAN and a short renal endurance season of under ten years after analyze were taken a crack at the case gathering. 100 IgAN patients with a renal endurance season of over ten years were taken on the benchmark group. IgA Oxford order scores, clinical information at pattern and during the development were gathered. Multivariate strategic relapse was utilized to examine factors related with the improvement of ESRD.
This was an observational case–control study. Fifty end stage renal infection patients with the essential driver of IgAN and a short renal endurance season of under ten years after renal biopsy were selected case gathering. 100 IgAN patients with a renal endurance season of over ten years after biopsy were surveyed as control gathering.
Patients tried out this examination were given the conclusion of essential IgAN somewhere in the range of 1997 and 2012 in the First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University. Avoidance standards for the two gatherings included: renal biopsy directed in different clinics, an auxiliary reason for IgAN, for example, Henoch-Schonlein purpura, fundamental lupus erythematosus, persistent liver illness and other immune system issues, matured <18 years at biopsy and history of cardiovascular occasions, carotid conduit medical procedure or any organ transplantation.
Factual examination was performed utilizing SPSS17.0 programming. Subjective factors were communicated as number and rate, analyzed utilizing the unpaired t-test (Student's t-test), the Mann–Whitney U test or Spearman relationship. Persistent factors were communicated as mean values ± standard deviation when typically circulated, or median(range) when not, and information were looked at utilizing the chi-square test or Fisher's accurate test or the Mann–Whitney U test, single direction ANOVA or Pearson relationship. Univariate strategic relapse and multivariate calculated relapse were utilized to decide components to results. A noteworthiness level of 0.05 was acknowledged.
IgAN patients with neurotic appraisal of M1, low benchmark eGFR, TA-Hb and high TA-UA were bound to advance to ESRD, and should be given more consideration. Suitable guidelines of UA, Hb and pee protein after analyze might be a promising treatment.
Pai-Yen Pan
Mixed epithelial-stromal tumor of the kidney (MESTK) may be a rare genitourinary tract tumor. it had been first presented by Michal and Syrucek in 1998. This tumor is characterized by its composition of both stromal solid areas and epithelial elements. Previous reports showed that MESTK attacks mostly middle-aged peri-menopausal women with estrogen therapy history, which indicates a correlation between MESTK and estrogen. However, rare cases were also reported in men and youngsters . albeit malignant cases are rare, but they need also been reported for both genders. Since 2004, MESTK has been included within the World Health Organization renal tumor classification. We report a 44-year-old Taiwanese male, with no history of hormonal therapy, who was found with a left renal tumor by self-health examination. Abdominal computerized tomography showed an 11x15 cm enhanced heterogeneous soft tissue mass with calcification and minimal fatty content. He subsequently received radical left nephrectomy. MESTK may be a benign renal tumor with malignant potential. we should always confine mind that patients receiving hormonal therapy have a better risk of developing cystic renal tumor, regardless of their gender.
Mixed epithelial stromal tumor of the kidney (MESTK) may be a rare genitourinary tract tumor. it had been first presented by Michal and Syrucek in 1998.1 This tumor is characterized by its composition of both stromal solid areas and epithelial elements. Previous reports showed that MESTK attacks mostly middle-aged peri-menopausal women with estrogen therapy history, which indicates a correlation between MESTK and estrogen.2 However, rare cases were also reported in men and youngsters .3 albeit malignant cases are rare, but they need also been reported for both genders. Since 2004, MESTK has been included within the World Health Organization renal tumor classification.
A 44-year-old male visited our hospital because he accidentally found an outsized palpable hard mass over his left upper abdominal area. there have been no symptoms of hematuria, flank pain, irritable urinary symptoms, bowel habit changes nor any bodyweight loss. Physical examinations were generally normal apart from a palpable (10 × 10 cm) fixed non-tender mass over his left upper quadrant area. Laboratory examinations, including urine analysis, were all normal apart from a small elevation of CA19-9 (47.52 U/mL). The recommended upper limit of normal for CA19-9 is 37 U/mL.
The urine cytology showed reactive urothelial cells and neutrophils. He was a hepatitis-B virus carrier, and had smoking and alcohol history. He began taking aspirin since he received left anterior descending arteria coronaria stenting for anteroseptal myocardial infarct . His mother had carcinoma history.
Abdominal computerized tomography showed an 11 × 15 cm enhanced heterogeneous soft tissue mass with calcification and minimal fatty content; No enlarged lymph nodes were found. the pictures favored a left renal angiomyolipoma with little fat content, but malignant renal tumor or epithelioid angiomyolipoma (EAML) were also considered.
Manal M Thomas
Nephrotic syndrome is that the commonest etiology of proteinuria in children. Steroid-resistant nephrosis (SRNS) is defined by resistance to plain steroid therapy, and it continues to be one among the foremost intractable etiologies of kidney failure . Molecular studies discovered specialized molecules in podocytes that play a task in proteinuria. Mutations in NPHS2 that encodes for podocin constitute a frequent explanation for SRNS worldwide. This study aimed to screen for podocin mutations in SRNS Egyptian children and their parents. Our study included patients from 10 unrelated Egyptian families diagnosed with SRNS. Mutational analysis of the NPHS2 gene was performed by polymerase chain reaction amplification of the entire coding region of the gene and direct sequencing. Positive consanguinity was detected in five cases, and 4 of them had a positive case history of SRNS during a loved one . Mutational analysis of NPHS2 revealed pathogenic mutations in four cases (40%) including a completely unique missense in one patient (c.1A>T; p.M1L). Our study concluded that mutations of NPHS2 gene are common among Egyptian children with SRNS. We support a model where ethnicity plays a crucial role in specific NPHS2 mutations since a completely unique mutation was found in one patient during this study. Future study on an outsized number of Egyptian patients with SRNS is warranted to spot the particular genetic contribution of this gene within the development of SRNS in our population, which could help in patients’ prognosis and management.
Nephrotic syndrome (NS) is one among the most typical primary kidney diseases, and its progressive forms can find yourself in chronic renal disorder . NS is that the results of an injury to the glomerular ï¬ltration barrier and presents clinically with heavy proteinuria, hypoalbuminemia, edema, and hyperlipidemia. Most patients with NS show an honest response to steroid therapy and have an honest prognosis. On the contrary, approximately 10%of children and 40% of adults are steroid-resistant [steroid-resistant nephrosis (SRNS)], showing no response to steroid therapy and having a poor prognosis. The progressive fate of SRNS to end-stage renal disease(ESRD) is seen in 50e70% of patients. Inherited structural defects of the glomerular ï¬ltration barrier are detected in isolated also as familial cases of SRNS. The pathological picture of focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) is revealed in approximately 63-73% of patients with childhood-onset SRNS.
Recent molecular studies involving children with sporadic primary SRNS have described mutations in many genes encoding proteins liable for the integrity of the glomerular ï¬ltration barrier. These genes include nephrin (NPHS1), podocin (NPHS2), alpha-actinin 4 (ACTN4), CD2-associated protein (CD2AP), Wilms’ tumor 1 gene (WT1), transient receptor potential cation channel 6 (TRPC6), and Laminin-beta-2(LAMB2). Proteins encoded by these genes (nephrin, podocin, alpha-actinin-4, an adapter protein anchoring CD2, and others) alter the function of the podocytes. Mutations of NPHS1, NPHS2,or WT1 could also be the explanation for severe sorts of NS in children, getting to ESRD. Of them, NPHS2 mutations are considered the foremost common and are observed in 10-30% of sporadic cases of SRNS with FSGS.8Theclinical scope of NPHS2 mutations has widened, with the proof that mutations within the corresponding gene podocin may cause NS at birth, in childhood, or in adulthood. it's recommended to see for NPHS2 mutations in parallel or before starting steroid therapy in NS patients to guage treatment beneï¬ts. NPHS2 mutations were ï¬rst identiï¬ed in children with SRNS diagnosed before the age of6 years who reached ESRD during the ï¬rst decade of life.11This study aims to screen for podocin mutations in Egyptian patients with SRNS and compare it with other published series.
Maria Hernandez-Fuentes
Wir und andere haben kürzlich Resistenzmerkmale bei Nierentransplantationen beschrieben, die eine differenzielle Expression von B-Zell-bezogenen Merkmalen und relative Erweiterungen von B-Zell-Untergruppen zeigten. In diesen Studien erhielten die Testgruppen, insbesondere die offenherzigen Empfänger, jedoch keine immunsuppressive (IS) Behandlung, die für den Rest der Vergleichsgruppen nicht üblich war. Die Arbeit wird zeigen, dass die Aussage des kürzlich beschriebenen Merkmals durch IS-Regimes überlagert war, die auch temporäre B-Zellen beeinflussten. Wir haben eine neue Signatur der Merkmalsexpression identifiziert und zertifiziert, die frei von Medikamenteneffekten war und offenherzige Patienten von gesunden Kontrollen unterschied, und haben dieses Merkmal bei mehreren Partnern zertifiziert. Wir werden zeigen, wie eine Änderung der IS-Medikamenteneinnahme die Bindung von Merkmalen an die Resistenz nicht zerstört, wenn diese vorhanden ist; sie beseitigt jedoch tatsächlich die Auswirkungen, die der medikamentösen Immunsuppression zuzuschreiben sind, und deckt somit grundlegende Resistenzmerkmale auf. Folglich würden wir argumentieren, dass IS-Regime den Ausgang vieler (wenn auch nicht aller) Eigenschaften beeinflussen und einer gründlichen Untersuchung bedürfen. Wenn IS tatsächlich den Ausgang von Zieleigenschaften verändern, sollten die Wirkstoffe für den IS-Medikamentenkonsum angepasst werden. Nur ein vergleichbarer Ansatz wird die Durchführung klinischer Pilotversuche zur IS-Minimierung sicher machen und somit wesentliche Verbesserungen im Nierenmanagement nach der Transplantation ermöglichen.
Im Gegensatz zu Untersuchungen von Resistenzen nach Lebertransplantationen, bei denen die Rate der operativen Resistenz wesentlich höher ist als bei Nierentransplantationen und die langfristigen Auswirkungen eines Absetzens oder einer Verringerung der immunsuppressiven Medikamente durch die kurzfristige Diagnose und erneute Einführung einer stärkeren Immunsuppression begrenzt werden, wird allgemein angenommen, dass eine uneingeschränkte Resistenz nach einer Nierentransplantation ein seltenes Ereignis ist und dass Absetzensfälle im Zusammenhang mit dem Medikamentenentzug langfristig die Leistungsfähigkeit und das Überleben beeinträchtigen können. Daher glauben die meisten Experten, dass es ohne anerkannte Biomarker der operativen Resistenz riskant ist, die Immunsuppression absichtlich abzubrechen, es sei denn, es liegt ein klinisches Symptom vor. Da wir wussten, dass es seltene Patienten gab, die die gesamte Immunsuppression abgesetzt hatten und weiterhin eine stabile, gute Funktion der transplantierten Niere zeigten und das Risiko daher erfolgreich selbst eingeschätzt hatten, wählten wir ein Untersuchungsschema, das darauf abzielte, Nierentransplantationsempfänger zu identifizieren, die bereits die gesamte Immunsuppression abgesetzt hatten. Identifizierte Patienten, die der Teilnahme zugestimmt hatten, lieferten Informationen und klinische Daten sowie natürliche Proben für Roboteruntersuchungen. Wenn möglich, wurden nur im Rahmen der Nierentransplantation von lebenden Spendern auch Versuche unternommen, Spenderzellen für genauere Tests zu gewinnen. Nach der Aufnahme wurden die Probanden Tests zur Beurteilung der Nierenfunktion (Serumkreatinin und eGFR-Messung), des Transplantatschadens (Proteinurie und Transplantatbiopsie), der Alloimmunität (zelluläre Immunitätsmessungen und Screening auf DSA) und umfassenderen Tests unterzogen, um die Anzahl der peripheren Thrombozyten durch Durchflusszytometrie sowie die Qualität der Expressionsprofile der peripheren Thrombozyten (Qualitätscluster und QT-PCR) und der abgestoßenen Harnepithelzellen (QT-PCR) zu bestimmen. Daten und Bioproben wurden von mehreren weiteren Partnern zu Analysezwecken gesammelt.
Zunächst muss betont werden, dass einige Aspekte des Studienaufbaus offensichtliche oder tatsächliche Einschränkungen bei den Ergebnissen der Studien aufwiesen. Die einzige mögliche Einschränkung ergibt sich aus dem Fehlen einer echten Vergleichsgruppe. Anders als bei den im Labor durchgeführten Studien zur Resistenz, wo es möglich ist, eine Vergleichsgruppe zu bilden, die die Testgruppe mit oder ohne wichtige Faktoren aus der zur Initiierung der Resistenz verwendeten Behandlung oder dem milden Zustand selbst nachahmt, ist dies im klinischen Umfeld nicht möglich. In der ersten Studie dieser Gruppe zu Qualitätsaussageprofilen bei Patienten mit plötzlicher Nierentransplantation entschieden sie sich, Probanden mit anhaltender Entlassung zu verwenden, die sie als immunsupprimiertes Nierentransplantatversagen mit erneuter Dialyse und Beendigung der Immunsuppression definierten, als ihre primäre Vergleichsgruppe. Diese Entscheidung trägt wahrscheinlich zu den Unterschieden zwischen vielen der Ergebnisse dieser Studie und nachfolgenden Studien dieser oder anderer Gruppen bei, bei denen die primäre Korrelation zwischen den aktiven Probanden und denen mit stabiler Nierentransplantatoperation, die eine regelmäßige Immunsuppression erhielten, bestand. Bei der Planung der ITN-Studienkonferenz wurden mehrere Korrelationsgruppen in Betracht gezogen. Tatsächlich wurden verschiedene Partner ausgewählt, die als geeignete Korrelation für mindestens einen Faktor angesehen werden konnten, darunter Personen mit stabiler Kapazität, die eine normale Immunsuppression erhielten, Personen, die eine normale Immunsuppression erhielten und bei denen aufgrund klinischer Merkmale und Biopsieergebnisse festgestellt wurde, dass sie eine alloimmuninterventionierte Gelenkverletzung hatten, Patienten mit stabiler Kapazität